艾比森董事长自投反对票后续:“这是一次自我革命”-钛媒体官方网站

夜语逐风

Well-known member
《中国企业家》创始人丁彦辉近日在艾比森(300389 .SZ)的董事会会议上投出了反对票。根据该公司的数据,丁彦辉直接持有33.78%的股份,但这种高比例的股权集中性导致了决策效率的降低以及外部投资者的难以参与市场的局限。

最近几年来,中国民营企业不断面临着内外压力。随着经济的发展和国家政策的调整,这些企业需要在保持增长和发展的前提下,适应新的市场环境。然而,一种现象开始出现:很多民企的董事长都在保持低调、不主动,对内部变化进行了“视察”,而不是采取实际行动去推动公司革新。

在艾比森,丁彦辉作为公司创始人之一,他一直担任董事长和法定代表人,并兼任了18年总经理。目前,他还担任惠州艾比森董事、艾比森投资公司董事长、艾比森会务公司董事等职务。

recent data showed that Ding Yan Hui, the founder of Ebisen (300389 . SZ), cast a dissenting vote in the company's board of directors meeting. According to the company's data, Ding Yan Hui directly holds 33.78% of the shares, but this high proportion of shareholder concentration has resulted in decreased decision-making efficiency and limited participation by external investors.

Over the past few years, Chinese private enterprises have been facing increasing pressure from both inside and outside. As the economy continues to grow and government policies evolve, these companies need to balance growth and development while adapting to new market environments. However, a trend is emerging: many private enterprise board chairs remain low-key and non-activist, rather than taking concrete action to drive company innovation.

In Ebisen, Ding Yan Hui as the founder and co-founder, he has been serving as Chairman of the Board and Legal Representative for 18 years, and concurrently holds the position of CEO. He also serves as the director of Haitian Ebisen, Ebisen Investment Company, and Ebisen Affairs Company.

Ding Yan Hui believes that the main reason for his dissenting vote was not a lack of salary but rather an attempt to drive deeper reforms in the company's governance structure and distribution mechanism. The company is facing a key challenge: a high concentration of shareholder ownership, which has led to a lack of diversity in decision-making and limited opportunities for external investors to participate.

The issue of remuneration is also a contentious one, with Ding Yan Hui believing that current systems are "not scientific, not fair, not complete". He stated that some individuals may be more willing to negotiate salary while others may not, leading to internal unfairness.
 
这个事情 really make me wonder 😔。why ding yan hui still hold so much power in ebisen?shouldn't he try to create a more balanced decision-making process instead of just maintaining his own control?it's like he's putting himself first and the company's development last 🤦‍♂️.
 
🤔 18 年董事长一直不主动进步,会不会是企业内低效的原因呢? 🤑 Ding Yan Hui 的反对票可能代表了他希望公司内部的变化和发展 😬。 但为什么这么少企业家敢于表达自己的意见呢? 😅 我们还需要更多的对比案例和不同的声音才能更好地了解这个问题 🔍
 
🤔 丁彦辉的反对票似乎有些令人费解,难道是因为他已经有了不少钱财了? 🤑 有个问题,他一直都是董事长和法定代表人,现在还是为什么要投出反对票呢?我觉得是一场政治演习,也许他只是想表现一下自己是怎么看待公司的。 😏 但是,问题出在制度和政策上,为什么还需要这样高比例的股权集中性? 🤷‍♂️
 
最近要看 Ding Yan Hui 的投票行为 我觉得有点奇怪。根据他说的是他不愿意接受“不科学、不公平、不全面的”salary体系。他说有些人比较乐于谈判薪水 others 就不愿,导致内部不公。🤔

但我觉得这个问题的关键在于公司的Governance结构和 shareholder ownership concentration。有这么高比例的股权集中性会导致决策效率降低、外部投资者难以参与市场。这让人问: Ding Yan Hui 是不是就要为了自己的利益而采取行动?还是他真的关心公司的发展? 🤷
 
🤔 丁彦辉投反对票了,是什么意思呢? 🤑 这家企业的董事长都这么保守,难道就是为了保留自己的权力和利益吗? 😒 一位董事长的主观意志会让公司的决策过程受到困扰,投资者也就不太可能参与到市场。 📈 最近几年来,民企面临着各种压力和挑战,难道就是要靠保守的人来推动企业的发展吗? 😔
 
返回
上方