反诈,浙江对“一刀切”说“不” | 南方周末

这事 really make me wanna pull my hair 🤯! why police need use "一刀切" approach all the time? just cos they think money in account is suspicious, they must freeze it? but sometimes innocent people get hurt, like poor girl with cancer... 16万货款还没发到她的手里,她就被冻结了账户 🤷‍♀️ how is that fair?! government need make sure police not be too zealous, or they will hurt some good people by mistake 💔
 
冻结款项的警方那边真的太过急性了,先不说他们做得对与错,我觉得这种规定根本没考虑到普通人在经济窘迫时的实际情况。有病人是想用钱治病,但又不能承担大笔数额的贷款,又何必冻结这点钱呢?这样的规定太过绝对,完全没有让人产生一种被保护和信心的感觉 …… 😔
 
🙄 这才是一种很常见的错法。刚刚收到货款就马上解冻资金,太过于简单和鲁莽了。首先要查明真实情况,确保该款项是合法的,这样才能真正解冻资金。另外,不应该因为病急需要用钱或者其他原因而轻易地解冻资金。 😊 有人说这是“一刀切”的做法,其实就是对反诈工作进行了一种过于极端和简单化的处理方式。
 
🤔 这次的反诈工作还是没能完全解决问题的根源啊?每天都有新的 news 传出,比如这位患病的女士,不是她自己把账户冻结了,就是因为“一刀切”来解冻了她的钱。 🤷‍♂️ 在反诈工作中,不能因为过于严格就忽视了无辜人的 rights。 😊 我们需要更细致地处理这种问题,并且要确保每个人的权利得到保护。 🙏
 
😕 综上所述,这种现象都在发生了好久了啊,反诈工作虽然有提高,但还是有个问题。 💸 买家与卖家的关系太复杂了,不能简单地根据“一刀切”的标准来判断是非。 🤔 还是需要更细致的调查、证据采集和解释,以避免无辜被冻结资金的情况发生。 🚫 最后,政府也应该在法律体系中加强相关规定的修订和落实,以减少这种误伤情形的发生率。 👍
 
🤔 really feel sad for her 🙏, who would want to freeze someone's account just because of a little mistake 😔? even if she did something wrong, shouldn't we try to find the root cause and help her out instead of being too strict? 🙅‍♂️ chinese law is so complicated 🤯, why can't they make it more straightforward like that? 📝 just want to see some mercy and understanding 🌈
 
返回
上方